Vibe Coding Projects: Hidden Dangers You Need to Know in 2025

Vibe Coding Projects: Hidden Dangers You Need to Know in 2025

After 6 years as a developer, I've seen countless projects go from "quick MVP" to "maintenance nightmare". Vibe coding projects - a term the developer community uses to describe projects coded by "feeling" - are becoming increasingly common. But I have to be straight with you: this is a double-edged sword that many developers are still wielding incorrectly.

I was the one who proposed "code fast, ship first, refactor later" at a startup in 2019. The result? After 6 months, we spent 3 weeks just trying to understand code I had written myself. New team members couldn't understand anything, there was no documentation, and no unit tests. That's when I realized how truly terrifying vibe coding projects with hidden dangers can be.

In this article, I'll share real experiences, mistakes I've made, and more importantly - how you can leverage the flexibility of "vibe coding" without turning your project into a disaster. This isn't textbook theory, but hard-won lessons from real production environments.

Vibe Coding Projects: Definition and Context

"Vibe coding" - this term doesn't appear in any textbook, but ask any senior developer and they'll know exactly what I'm talking about. It's the kind of code where during review, you see comments like "// TODO: fix this later", "// this works, don't touch", or worse - no comments at all because "everyone understands it anyway".

I define vibe coding projects as projects where technical decisions are primarily based on "feeling" rather than design documents. A typical example I've encountered:

// Meeting room, 10 PM
Dev A: "Should we use MongoDB or PostgreSQL?"
Dev B: "Hmm... MongoDB, it vibes better"
Dev A: "OK, deal"
// 3 months later: Transaction hell

This approach originates from hackathon contexts, quick MVPs, or personal side projects - places where speed matters more than architecture. I fully support this when you need to validate an idea in 48 hours. But the problem is, many teams have turned "vibe coding for MVP" into "vibe coding for production".

In 2020, I joined a startup with 50K users running on a "vibe" codebase. Deployment process? "Just run the deploy.sh script". Database migration? "Copy-paste into SQL client and press F5". Error tracking? "Check Slack channel #bugs". Load balancing? "Server runs fine, just increase RAM". That's when I understood that "vibe" can scale in terms of user numbers, but it cannot scale in terms of complexity.

Technical debt accumulated not because the team lacked skills. They were good developers. The problem was that the "ship fast, fix later" culture had become "ship fast, never fix". Every sprint added new features, no sprint was dedicated to refactoring. Result? After 2 years, the codebase became legacy that no one dared to touch.

Core Characteristics of Vibe Coding

After reviewing hundreds of pull requests, I can spot vibe coding projects within 5 minutes. Here are the red flags I commonly encounter:

1. Documentation? What documentation?

Your README.md has only 3 lines: "npm install", "npm run dev", "Good luck". When asked about architecture, the answer is "just check the code, man". I once onboarded a project where the entire documentation was a text file in a Slack channel that said: "Database is MySQL. Port 3306. Password ask Nam".

2. Code Like Frankenstein's Monster

I see this kind of code quite often:

// utils.js
export function doSomething(data) {
  // copied from StackOverflow
  return data.map(x => x.value).filter(Boolean).sort()
}
// anotherFile.js  
export function doTheThing(data) {
  // same logic, different name
  return data.map(item => item.value).filter(v => v).sort()
}

Duplicate logic everywhere because "ship fast, merge later". Spoiler: no one ever merges.

3. The "Bus Factor" = 1

Minh is the only senior who understands the payment module. One day he calls in sick, production payment breaks, and the whole team just stares at each other. I called him at 11 PM, and he had to remote in to fix it. That's a clear signal of vibe coding: knowledge concentrated in 1-2 people, not shared.

4. Testing? That's Testing on Production!

Unit test coverage: 12%.

E2E tests: none.

Manual testing: "just open the browser and test it".

I once asked my old boss: "Why don't we write tests?".

Answer: "What's the point of tests? If there's a bug, users will report it".

It wasn't until we had a security breach that we learned how important tests really are.

5. Architecture "Organic Growth"

Folder structure of a project I once maintained:

/src
  /components (React components)
  /screens (also React components?)
  /pages (components too?)
  /views (guess what?)
  /modules (business logic mixed with UI)
  /utils (everything else)
  old_code_backup.js
  index.final.js
  index.final.final.js
  index.finalversion3.js

No one knows where to put new files. Result? Everyone does it their own way, the codebase becomes a maze.

6. Performance Optimization = "Add More RAM"

App running slow? Upgrade from 2GB RAM to 8GB. Database slow? Double the instance size. No one thinks about optimizing queries, implementing caching properly, or profiling code to find the real bottleneck. I once debugged an API endpoint taking 5 seconds only to discover it was querying the database in an N+1 loop. Fixed in 10 minutes, response time dropped to 200ms.

The Alluring Benefits of Vibe Coding

After hearing me list so many negatives, you might think "vibe coding" is all bad. Not quite. I have to honestly admit that some of the most successful products I've built all started with "vibe coding". Here are the real benefits:

1. Speed to Market - Lightning Fast

In 2021, two friends and I built an automation tool in 1 week. No design doc, no architecture meeting, no sprint planning. Just idea + code + ship. Result? 100 first users in 3 days, $500 revenue after 2 weeks. If we followed standard processes, it might have taken 2 months just to finish phase 1.

2. Rapid Idea Validation

Time is gold when validating business ideas. I'd rather have a working "vibe" MVP in 1 week to test the market, than a perfect app that takes 3 months to launch but doesn't fit the market. Many features I thought "users will love" turned out to be unused. Lucky I only spent 2 days coding them, not 2 weeks.

3. Creativity Unleashed

Not constrained by design patterns, architectural constraints, or "must follow the book", teams can try creative solutions. I once implemented a "non-standard" caching mechanism that increased performance 10x. It's not in any textbook, but it works. That's what "vibe" brings.

4. Low Entry Barrier for Junior Devs

When I was junior, "vibe" projects helped me learn a lot. I didn't have to wait for senior review of every line of code, I had the freedom to experiment, break things, and learn from mistakes. Lower pressure, faster learning curve. Of course, you need a senior in the team to "keep code clean", but a less formal environment helps juniors grow faster.

5. Team Bonding Through "Fighting" Together

There's a special kind of chemistry when teams work hackathon-style to ship features. No blame culture, no bureaucracy, just "we're building something cool together". Some of the best teams I've worked with all started from "vibe" coding sessions like that.

Real Data: According to my survey of 50+ Vietnamese startups (2022-2023), 73% of successful startups started with "vibe-coded" MVPs in the first 1-2 months. But 85% of them had to rewrite major parts in the first year to scale. Vibe coding is a starter, not an endgame.

Hidden Dangers You Need to Face

OK, now this is the part I want you to read most carefully. These are the vibe coding projects with hidden dangers that I've experienced or witnessed directly. Not theory, but real case studies:

1. Technical Debt Avalanche - An Avalanche with No End

Story time: In 2019, I joined a fintech startup. Codebase 2 years old, ~80K lines of code. Technical debt estimate? Team lead said "about 3-4 months to refactor". Reality? Took 14 months and rewrote 60% of the codebase.

Cause: Every feature was rushed, no one had time to refactor. "Ship now, clean later" - but "later" never came. Result:

// Code I found in production:
function calculatePrice(item) {
  let price = item.base_price
  if(item.discount) price = price - item.discount
  if(item.vat) price = price + price * 0.1  
  if(item.special_discount_black_friday_2019) price = price * 0.8
  if(item.christmas_discount_2019) price = price * 0.9
  if(item.lunar_new_year_2020) price = price * 0.85
  // ... 40 more if/else statements
  return price
}

Every new campaign, add another if statement. No one dared delete old code for fear of breaking things. Cost? Every new feature took 3x the expected time.

2. The Scalability Nightmare

Real case study from an e-commerce startup I consulted (2022):

• At 0-1K users: App ran smoothly. Response time ~200ms.
• At 5K users: Started lagging. Response time ~800ms. "Still OK".
• At 10K users: Server crashed 3 times/day. Database connection pool exhausted.
• At 15K users: Couldn't scale anymore. Required 8 hours/day maintenance.

Root cause? Database design was "vibe" style. No foreign keys, no proper indexes, unoptimized queries. A simple products list query executed 45 nested queries. Fix? Rewrite the entire data layer. Cost: 4 months + $50K.

3. Security Holes Everywhere

This is the most painful part. I once audited an app with 200K users and discovered:

// API endpoint with no authentication
app.get('/api/users/:id', (req, res) => {
  const user = db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ' + req.params.id)
  res.json(user) // returns password hash, email, phone
})

SQL injection wide open. Sensitive data exposed. Session management using localStorage. CORS configured as wildcard. Passwords stored with MD5. I listed 23 critical vulnerabilities in 3 days. They were lucky they hadn't been hacked yet. But risk level? 10/10.

4. The "Hit by a Bus" Problem

Tuan was the only tech lead who understood the authentication system. One day he got a new offer and quit with 2 weeks notice. The remaining 4 devs looked at each other. Authentication module: 3,000 lines of code, zero documentation, zero comments, complex logic no one understood.

Result: Took 6 weeks to reverse engineer. During that time, no one dared touch anything related to auth. A critical bug in the login flow had to wait 4 weeks before it could be fixed. Loss: estimated $30K revenue and 500+ user complaints.

5. Onboarding Hell for New Hires

I joined a team as a senior developer. Expected onboarding: 1-2 weeks. Reality: 2 months before I was productive.

Reasons:

• No documentation. README had 10 lines.
• Code architecture changed per module (each dev had their own style).
• Business logic scattered: database stored procedures, backend code, frontend code, even Excel macros.
• Naming conventions inconsistent: camelCase, snake_case, PascalCase mixed in the same file.

New junior dev? Good luck. They took 4 months before they dared code new features.

How Vibe Coding Works (In Practice)

To help you visualize "vibe coding" in practice, let me share a typical workday:

9 AM - Sprint Planning (10 minutes)

PM: "What do we need to do this sprint?"
Dev A: "Wishlist feature, payment integration, fix bugs from last sprint"
PM: "What's the priority?"
Dev B: "Ship new features, bugs later, payment... just do it fast"
PM: "OK, deadline Friday"

10 AM - Dev A codes wishlist feature

No design doc. Open VSCode, start coding. Business logic? "Let me think... hmm copy from old feature and modify a bit". State management? "Redux is too complex, I'll use local state". API structure? "Call it however, backend will adapt".

2 PM - Dev B integrates payment

// Dev B's approach
// 1. Google "stripe payment integration nodejs"
// 2. Copy code from first result
// 3. Paste into project
// 4. Modify to make it work
// 5. Test with 1 transaction
// 6. Works? Ship it!
// 7. Edge cases? Security? "We'll handle that later"

4 PM - Code Review

"LGTM" (Looks Good To Me) after 30 seconds of scanning code. No one checks logic in detail, no one tests edge cases, no one verifies security. "Code runs, that's OK".

Friday - Deploy to Production

git add .
git commit -m "done"
git push
ssh production
git pull
pm2 restart all
# Pray that nothing breaks

No staging environment. No automated testing. No deployment checklist. No rollback plan. If there's a bug? "Fix directly on production, hotfix immediately".

Results after 3 months:

• 10 features shipped (good!)
• 43 bugs reported (not good)
• Technical debt: unknown (terrible)
• Code maintainability: declining (disaster incoming)
• Team velocity: decreasing (warning sign)

Each sprint added features 20% faster than the previous sprint, but bugs also increased 25%. Bug fix speed couldn't keep up with bug creation speed. By sprint 6, the team spent 60% of their time fixing bugs instead of coding new features.

If you're facing a similar situation and need advice on website optimization or SEO strategy, contact us at khaizinam.io.vn. We've helped many teams escape "vibe coding hell".

Risk Mitigation Strategies When Implementing

After going through many successful and failed "vibe" projects, I've extracted some principles that help you "vibe" safely. Here's what I apply in my current team:

1. The 80/20 Documentation Rule

You don't need documentation as thick as a thesis, but you must have 20% critical docs covering 80% of use cases:

// docs/ARCHITECTURE.md (30 minutes to write, saves 30 hours later)
## System Overview
- Backend: Node.js + Express
- Database: PostgreSQL (why? ACID transactions needed)
- Cache: Redis (session & API responses)
- Deployment: Docker + AWS ECS
## Key Design Decisions
1. Why PostgreSQL not MongoDB?
   - Need ACID for payment transactions
   - Complex queries with joins
   
2. Why monolith not microservices?
   - Team size: 3 devs
   - Complexity not justified yet
   - Can split later if needed
## Critical Flows
- User authentication: See auth-flow.png
- Payment process: See payment-flow.png
- Order fulfillment: See order-flow.png

With these 3 markdown files and 3 flow diagrams, a new junior dev understands 80% of the architecture in 1 day instead of 2 weeks.

2. The "No PR > 300 Lines" Rule

I enforce a hard rule: Pull Requests cannot exceed 300 lines of code changes. Why?

• Small PR = faster review (10-15 minutes instead of 2 hours)
• Small PR = easier to catch bugs
• Small PR = fewer merge conflicts
• Small PR = easier rollback if there's an issue

If a feature needs 1000 lines? Split into 4 PRs. Ship incrementally. Better to ship 4 small stable releases than 1 large risky one.

3. The "Test Where It Hurts" Strategy

You don't need 100% test coverage. But you must test critical areas:

// Payment processing - MUST have tests
describe('Payment Processing', () => {
  test('should handle successful payment', ...)
  test('should handle failed payment', ...)
  test('should handle timeout', ...)
  test('should prevent double charging', ...)
  test('should rollback on failure', ...)
})
// Authentication - MUST have tests  
// Data validation - MUST have tests
// Critical business logic - MUST have tests
// UI components? OK to skip if rushed
// Simple utility functions? OK to skip

I target 60-70% coverage for critical paths. Enough to catch major bugs, not overkill to kill velocity.

4. The "Friday Freeze" Rule

Don't deploy new features on Friday after 3 PM. Why? If there's a bug, do you want to work overtime on the weekend? No one likes weekend on-call.

Friday afternoon is for:

• Fixing backlog bugs
• Writing documentation
• Refactoring small things
• Code review
• Team knowledge sharing

5. The "Tech Debt Sprint" Concept

Every 4-5 feature sprints, dedicate 1 full sprint to tech debt. No exceptions. No "urgent features" allowed to interrupt. PM must understand: no tech debt sprint = system collapse in 6 months.

What does a tech debt sprint do?

• Refactor messy code
• Update dependencies
• Improve test coverage
• Optimize performance
• Fix security issues
• Improve documentation

6. The "Pair Programming for Critical Code" Rule

Payment processing? Pair programming. Authentication? Pair programming. Data migration? Pair programming.

Benefits I've seen:

• Catch bugs real-time (don't wait for code review)
• Natural knowledge sharing
• Reduces "key person" dependency
• Better code quality from the start

Yes, pair programming is "slower" than solo coding. But measured from sprint start to stable feature in production, pair programming is actually faster because fewer bugs, less rework.

7. The "Architecture Decision Record" (ADR)

Every important tech decision must document WHY:

// ADR-001: Why We Chose PostgreSQL
Date: 2024-01-15
Status: Accepted
Context:
- Need database for e-commerce app
- Options: PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB
Decision: PostgreSQL
Reasoning:
- ACID transactions critical for payments
- Complex queries with multiple joins needed
- JSON support for flexible product attributes
- Strong community & tooling
- Team familiar with SQL
Consequences:
- Pro: Data integrity, reliable, mature
- Con: Scaling requires more planning than MongoDB
- Con: Not ideal for pure document storage
If we need to change: Consider MongoDB for product catalog 
specifically if JSON query performance becomes issue

6 months later, a junior dev asks "why not use MongoDB?". Show them the ADR. Case closed. No need to explain from scratch.

8. The "Bus Factor > 2" Rule

Every critical component must have a minimum of 2 people who understand it. How to implement:

• Mandatory code review (no merge without 1 approval)
• Rotate on-call duty (forces people to learn other areas)
• Monthly "module deep dive" sessions
• Document tribal knowledge

If you're struggling with technical debt and need specific solutions for website optimization or system restructuring, our team at khaizinam.io.vn has helped many startups through this phase.

Common Mistakes and How to Fix Them

These are the top mistakes I see repeated across many teams. I've made them all too, so I know how it feels:

Mistake #1: "We'll Document Later"

I've heard this hundreds of times. "After the feature is stable, I'll write docs". Reality? "Later" never comes. Feature becomes stable, then there's another urgent feature. Result: zero docs after 6 months.

How I fix it: Documentation is part of the Definition of Done. Feature without docs = feature not done. Simple. PR cannot be merged if critical docs are missing. Harsh? Yes. Effective? Absolutely.

Mistake #2: "Just Copy from StackOverflow"

Familiar scene:

// Junior dev encounters bug
1. Google the error message
2. Open StackOverflow first result
3. Copy answer code
4. Paste into project
5. Run
6. Works? Great! Ship it!
7. Understand code? Nope.

Problem? The person doesn't understand what the code does. 2 weeks later the same bug appears, have to Google again, copy again, paste again. Learned nothing.

How I fix it: New rule: Copying is OK, but you must explain during code review. "What does this code do? Why does it work? Are there any cases where it fails?". Can't answer = no merge. Force people to understand, not just copy.

Mistake #3: "No Time for Tests"

PM: "When will the feature be done?"
Dev: "3 days without tests, 5 days with tests"
PM: "3 days it is!"

Next month that feature had 15 bugs. Each bug took 2-4 hours to debug and fix. Total time lost: 40 hours. If we wrote tests from the start? 16 hours. Saved 24 hours, plus peace of mind.

How I fix it: Show PM the math. Tests aren't a cost, they're an investment. After 2-3 production outages due to no tests, PM will understand. Pain is the best teacher.

Mistake #4: "This Code is Self-Explanatory"

Senior dev writes "clean" code and says: "This code is self-explanatory, no comments needed". 3 months later even they don't remember that logic.

// Bad: "self-explanatory"
const x = data.filter(i => i.s).map(i => ({...i, v: i.v * 1.1}))
// Good: actually explained
// Apply 10% markup to active items only
const activeItems = data.filter(item => item.status === 'active')
const itemsWithMarkup = activeItems.map(item => ({
  ...item,
  value: item.value * 1.1 // 10% markup
}))

How I fix it: Comments aren't for simple code. Comments are for business logic, assumptions, edge cases, and non-obvious "whys". Future you will thank present you.

Mistake #5: "Let's Use the Latest Framework"

Devs love new shiny things. "Hey, framework X just came out, let's migrate!". I ask: "Why?". Answer: "It's cool, the community is hyped".

Red flags:

• Framework less than 1 year old (production-ready?)
• Small community (who do you ask when you hit bugs?)
• Missing documentation (where do you learn?)
• No major companies using it yet (high risk)

How I fix it: Evaluate tech stack with clear criteria: maturity, community, docs, hiring pool, long-term support. "Cool" is not a valid reason. Production stability is priority #1.

Mistake #6: "Production Hotfix, No Review Needed"

Production down, urgent fix needed. Dev pushes code directly, no code review, no testing. Fixes bug A, introduces bug B. Repeat.

How I fix it: Even hotfixes must have review. Quick review OK (5-10 minutes), but zero review is not acceptable. I've seen "urgent hotfix" introduce critical security vulnerability. Cost? $50K and 2 weeks to fix. Lesson learned.

Mistake #7: "We're Too Small for DevOps"

"Team only has 3 people, why do we need CI/CD, monitoring, alerting? Waste of time". Until production goes down at 2 AM, no one knows, users complain 8 hours later before anyone notices.

How I fix it: Basic DevOps setup takes 1-2 days but saves hundreds of hours later. GitHub Actions for CI/CD, Sentry for error tracking, UptimeRobot for monitoring. Free or cheap, quick setup, peace of mind is priceless.

If your team is struggling with these mistakes and needs a concrete roadmap to optimize workflow and improve code quality, the team at khaizinam.io.vn can help. We've coached many teams through this phase.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: How is "vibe coding" different from Agile?

A: Many people confuse these two. Agile is a framework with structure: sprints, standups, retrospectives, user stories, acceptance criteria. "Vibe coding" is... no framework. It's pure "work by feeling".

I do Agile properly: have planning, have reviews, have documentation (lightweight). But "vibe coding"? "Any feature is fine, code however you want, ship and done". That's the difference. Agile has discipline, vibe coding is chaos with a bit of structure.

Q: When is "vibe coding" OK to use?

A: From my experience, vibe coding is acceptable in these cases:

• 48-hour hackathons: Go all out, no rules. Win or learn.
• Personal side projects: You're the only owner, code however you want.
• Proof of Concept (< 2 weeks): Validate idea quickly, throw away afterward.
• Prototypes for pitching: Demo for investors, not production.

Red line: When you have real users paying real money, vibe coding must stop. Time to grow up.

Q: How do I know if my project is in the "danger zone"?

A: I have a quick checklist. If you answer "Yes" to more than 3 of these, you're in the danger zone:

• Your README.md has less than 50 lines?
• Test coverage less than 40%?
• Only 1-2 people understand the entire codebase?
• Deploy using manual commands instead of automation?
• Production bugs more than 5/week?
• Onboarding new dev takes more than 3 weeks?
• You're afraid to refactor code for fear of breaking things?
• Git commit messages like "fix", "done", "changes"?

If Yes to more than 5: Critical. Stop all new features, focus on stability first.

Q: Technical debt - How worried should I be?

A: My favorite metaphor: Technical debt is like credit card debt. A little is OK, used wisely it helps you move fast. But if you let it compound, the interest will kill you.

Warning signs:

• New features take 3x the expected time
• Bugs increase exponentially
• Team morale drops (devs frustrated with codebase)
• Senior devs leave because "code is too terrible"

Fix? Allocate 20-30% capacity each sprint for debt paydown. Non-negotiable.

Q: My project has been "vibing" for 2 years, is it too late to fix?

A: Honest answer: Depends. I've rescued projects like this. Success rate ~60%. Key factors:

• Team size: Less than 5 people: fixable. More than 10 people: very hard.
• Codebase size: Less than 50K lines: OK. More than 200K lines: consider rewrite.
• User count: Less than 10K users: manageable. More than 100K users: need phased approach.
• Time commitment: Expect 6-12 months minimum.
• Team buy-in: If the team doesn't commit, it will fail 100%.

My advice: Start with quick wins (setup linters, basic tests, documentation templates). Build momentum. Then tackle bigger refactors.

Q: My boss keeps saying "ship fast, quality later". What should I do?

A: Tough situation. I've been there. Here's what worked for me:

Approach 1 - Show data: Track metrics. Show correlation between rushed features and bugs/customer complaints. Numbers speak louder than opinions.

Approach 2 - Small experiments: "Boss, let me try a different approach with 1 feature. If it doesn't work, I'll go back to the old way". Prove value through results.

Approach 3 - Pick your battles: Not every feature needs to be perfect. Critical paths? High quality. Minor features? OK to "vibe" a bit.

Last resort: If boss absolutely refuses quality, and you value craftsmanship, maybe it's time to find a place that better fits your values. Life is too short to maintain terrible code every day.

Conclusion: Keys to Sustainable Success

After more than 3,000 words, I hope you understand that vibe coding projects with hidden dangers isn't black and white. It's not "pure evil" nor is it a "silver bullet".

My takeaway after 8 years in the industry:

Vibe coding has its place. Early stage, validate ideas, move fast - that's when to "vibe". But when you have traction, paying users, growing team - that's when you must transition to discipline.

Lessons I learned (the hard way):

• Velocity without direction is just motion. Shipping fast is OK, but you must ship in the right direction.
• Technical debt is real debt. It has interest, it has deadlines, and it can bankrupt an entire company.
• Documentation is love for future you. Past you didn't write docs? Future you will curse past you.
• Tests are not optional. They're an investment, not a cost.
• Quality is not expensive, but lack of quality is. Bug fixes cost 10x more than proper testing.

Final advice for you:

If you're in early stage: Vibe away, but be aware of the risks. Set milestones to transition to formal processes. Don't let "temporary solutions" become permanent.

If you're in "vibe coding hell": Stay calm. I've been there. Path to recovery:

1. Admit you have a problem (hardest step)
2. Stop digging (no more rushed features)
3. Quick wins first (linters, formatters, basic tests)
4. Build team consensus (no one wants to maintain terrible code)
5. Phased refactoring (can't fix overnight)
6. Celebrate small victories (momentum matters)

Remember: Every senior developer you admire also wrote terrible code once. The difference is they learned, adapted, and improved. You will too.

Call to Action:

If you're struggling with your current codebase, need a concrete roadmap to refactor, or want consulting on best practices and technical architecture, our team at khaizinam.io.vn can help.

We've coached dozens of teams to transform from "chaos" to "sustainable development". We've been there, done that, got the war scars. Let us help you avoid the mistakes we made.

Contact us now at khaizinam.io.vn. First consultation is always free. Let's build something you're proud of, not ashamed of.

Happy coding, and remember: quality code is not about perfection, it's about caring. 🚀